On Mar 23, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Thomas Perl wrote: > 2010/3/23 Andrew Flegg <and...@bleb.org>: >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 00:20, Attila Csipa <ma...@csipa.in.rs> wrote: >>> On Tuesday 23 March 2010 00:39:09 Darren Long wrote: >>>> However, in the general case where the source and the executable are not >>>> the same, I believe that maemo.org would be obliged to continue to make >>>> the source available, for at least 3 years. >> [...] >> If the source code doesn't accompany every download, then 3a doesn't >> apply so one of 3b or 3c must. >> >> If 3b applies, maemo.org has to continue to host the source. > > Why not pull the binaries and source packages from the *repositories* > at the author's request and put them up in a "archival" directory that is > not exposed via a Debian repository (and therefore not interfering with > the HAM policy, etc..)?
This of course can be done. I also think it the most sensible solution since it takes the packages out of the repos but preserves them physically for any eventual legal issue. Niels - do we have a repository expressly for this type of package? And if you could tell me it's location on disk I can move forward with the developer's request if we have consensus. Jeremiah _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
