On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:15, Tomi Ollila <tomi.oll...@guru.guru-group.fi> wrote: > > I personally dislike polluting /opt -tree with lots of application > directories (although that is allowed by FHS). Better alternative would > be /opt/<provider>/... (IMHO) (also allowed by FHS), where <provider> > is 'maemo' (is that LANANA-registered (what LANANA???). FHS also says > there might be bin/, lib/, include/ and <application-name> directories > intermixed there (which I don't like either). But YMMV.
But polluting /opt/maemo with lots of application directories is better? If you want to encourage /opt/<provider>/<application> then <provider> should be some kind of team or individual who's behind multiple apps. Using /opt/maemo for anything other than maemo-optify output could cause confusion, if not problems. Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:and...@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/ Maemo Community Council chair _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
