Just a suggestion but what about possible LTS releases. Similar to say Ubuntu Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
-----Original Message----- From: Sinner from the Prairy <sinnerb...@gmail.com> Sender: mageia-dev-boun...@mageia.org Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 16:05:46 To: <mageia-dev@mageia.org> Reply-To: Mageia development mailing-list <mageia-dev@mageia.org> Subject: Re: [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? atilla ontas wrote: > I'm just wondering if we follow Mandriva's release cycle model. (...) > One more thing. Do we follow Mandriva's release naming scheme? I.e. do > we call our first release 2011.x ? I don't like this naming scheme and > suggesting using number of release as naming like Mageia 1.0 or using > code names. > What's your opinion? I'd like 2 releases a year, plus a naming convention similar to current one (2010.0, 2010.1). It makes it easy to figure out which version to install (think newcomer). Also, I'd like to not do "Spring" "Fall"... , as Spring in the North is Autumn in the South. Think globally. Salut, Sinner