On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Michael Scherer <m...@zarb.org> wrote:
> And that's not the question, this is a basic usability issue, if a > rather important portion of the users associate a word with something, > this sound sane to no reuse the same word to hold a different meaning in > a very similar context, or it will cause confusion. > Again, a good argument for a name with no conflicts and no negative meanings: "paris". -- Hoyt
