Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 11:26:54, Angelo Naselli a écrit : > In data domenica 16 gennaio 2011 00:07:56, Anssi Hannula ha scritto: > > Hi all! > > > > Should we have a %mdkversion (and %mdkver/%mdvver) that is hardcoded to > > 201100 for the time being, or should we not have one at all? > > > > Not having it will cause any src.rpms that have any > > "%if %mdkversion < x" to fail to build. > > > > I'm strongly in favor of having it for compatibility reasons, so that > > most MDV src.rpms keep building on Mageia for the time being, including > > those provided by any 3rd party packagers. > > > > Not having the macro will cause us to lose that compatibility for very > > little benefit, IMO. It could maybe be removed after several releases, > > but not before. > > I believe you're right at the moment, now that we're importing things, > but after the very first time, starts becoming nonsense since > i believe we're going to work on our packages distro per distro not taking > every time srpms from mandriva as we're doing now. >
Well, it may be a naïve hope, but I thought I could maintain the same spec file for Mandriva and Mageia for my packages. It's not just a matter of importing SRPMS from Mandriva to Mageia. > > However, it seems blino disagreed with this, and he thinks we should not > > have these macros at all. > > the good should be to have some common macros the allows us to build > packages form one distro to other. I ported in my rhel 4 and 5 mkrel to get > most compatibility to mandriva specs. But now fedora (hope rhel 6 as well) > uses %dist so why not to use a common point to that macro and extend > compatibility? > OK with that. Samuel