On 2 March 2011 19:37, nicolas vigier <bo...@mars-attacks.org> wrote: > On Wed, 02 Mar 2011, Ahmad Samir wrote: > >> On 2 March 2011 12:01, Thierry Vignaud <thierry.vign...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On 2 March 2011 07:28, Yann Ciret <mag...@zamiz.net> wrote: >> >> I prefer the actual system with always same subject. It's easier to >> >> follow the subject in mail client software. If the subject will change >> >> with bug life, I am not sure Thunderbird can group all messages as a >> >> conversation. >> > >> > Indeed. it's annoying for filtering >> > >> >> Actually, no, thunderbird doesn't break the thread of a bug due to >> this issue, as it doesn't use just the subject to group emails. > > Mail clients usually use "In-Reply-To:" or "References:" headers to > thread mails. But it seems gmail is also using subjects for this. > > However according to this, text inside square brackets is ignored : > http://www.quora.com/Is-it-possible-to-change-or-add-words-to-the-subject-of-a-Gmail-email-and-keep-it-in-the-same-thread > > So if we add '[New]' instead of 'New:' in the subject, maybe this would fix > the problem with gmail ? > >
Yeah, that works, dmorgan tested and it works, he's applied the changes. Thanks a bunch :) -- Ahmad Samir