On 24 March 2011 00:48, Olivier Blin <[email protected]> wrote: > Ahmad Samir <[email protected]> writes: > >> We shouldn't under any circumstances add kde3 in the repos, fork or not. >> >> Users see a package in the repos and they expect it to be maintained, >> this will not be the case, we can't support KDE4 and KDE3 at the same >> time. Past experience tells us this is a major hassle/pain, and we >> shouldn't have to go back to that murky situation. > > That's not KDE3, it's a fork with new maintainers. >
The point still stands, will Trinity be another DE? or will we have to add conflicts in Trinity <-> KDE4 specs? If the latter, then I don't fancy adding the conflicts in each of the various kde4 specs (having just removed them a few months ago, and that took quite a lot of work), just to have another DE. >> Also there shouldn't be any qt3 dependant packages in the repos; the >> only and sole reason qt3 is in the Mageia repos is that stewbintn said >> he needs it for some LSB stuff, but nothing is built with qt3-devel as >> BR AFAIK and nothing should be. > > It should be ok to add back qt3-devel temporarily, and remove it again > once Trinity gets ported to Qt4. > > -- > Olivier Blin - blino > -- Ahmad Samir
