On 6 May 2011 15:33, <[email protected]> wrote: > Revision 1122 Author obgr_seneca Date 2011-05-06 15:33:19 +0200 (Fri, 06 May > 2011) > > Log Message > > corrected draklive-install.pot to pass msgfmt -c
Please stop doing that. the pot file isn't supposed to pass msgfmt -c. Only *.po are supposed to. All these changes will be reverted next time we'll sync the reference catalog (.pot) with the code. When creating a new translation (for a language for which there were no translation before), one copy the foobar.pot as LL.po the "fuzzy" tag is here to force him/her to initialize the header (language, encoding, ...) I'm OK with modyfing perl_checker to default to UTF-8, maybe adding an option to add the package name but doing manually and playing ping-pong with perl_checker is totally wrong. eg: dev1 set package name & encoding in pot dev2 run "make *pot" after adding new stings and header got reversed dev1 set again package name & encoding in pot dev5 run "make *pot" after adding new stings and header got reversed (...) > Modified Paths > > draklive-install/trunk/po/draklive-install.pot > > Modified: draklive-install/trunk/po/draklive-install.pot > =================================================================== > --- draklive-install/trunk/po/draklive-install.pot 2011-05-06 13:10:55 UTC > (rev 1121) > +++ draklive-install/trunk/po/draklive-install.pot 2011-05-06 13:33:19 UTC > (rev 1122) > @@ -4,13 +4,13 @@ > # > msgid "" > msgstr "" > -"Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n" > +"Project-Id-Version: draklive-install\n" > "POT-Creation-Date: 2010-04-02 14:45+0200\n" > "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n" > "Last-Translator: FULL NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS>\n" > "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <[email protected]>\n" > "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" > -"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=CHARSET\n" > +"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n" > "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8-bit\n" > "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n" > > > -- > R : Tu vois ! > > Q : Tu crois ? > > > R : Ça casse l'ordre chronologique de l'échange. > > > > Q : En quoi répondre au dessus est-il gênant ?
