On 23 June 2011 07:58, Dexter Morgan <dmorga...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Thierry Vignaud > <thierry.vign...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 22 June 2011 19:41, Florian Hubold <doktor5...@arcor.de> wrote: >>>> Well, it's quite possible that we have to include that in Mageia 1 as >>>> well, as this will be security update for Firefox 4. If we don't want to >>>> patch every CVE then we have to include it into Mageia 1 as well.. >>>> >>>> >>> Would be nice to know, if this is planned? >>> >>> I have rebuild FF5 here locally for Mageia 1, and the only addons that i >>> lost is >>> Linkification, but that is merely due to it's developers who already messed >>> up >>> with FF4. They don't offer the proper update on Firefox Addons site. >>> >>> So, please, what about Firefox 5 for Mageia 1 as an update (backport?) >> >> Humm, MGA is stricter than MDV and refuses to backport packages >> directly from cauldron: >> >> mgarepo submit --define section=core/backports -t 1 </dev/null >> Submitting xulrunner at revision 110647 >> URL: svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/xulrunner >> error: command failed: ssh pkgsubmit.mageia.org >> /usr/local/bin/submit_package -t 1 --define >> sid=4845bffd-7f94-4c8c-931e-cfb746d01a0d --define >> section=core/backports -r 110647 >> svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/xulrunner >> error: svn+ssh://svn.mageia.org/svn/packages/cauldron/xulrunner is not >> allowed for this target >> > > yes it needs to go to backports_testing before iirc >
Got a link to a thread on -dev ML / irc meeting log / <insert your favourite communication method here>, where this was decided? > But i think sec team need to speak of FF5 first because i think this > will be a candidate for updates regarding new firefox upstream policy > -- Ahmad Samir