2011/7/4 John Balcaen <mik...@mageia.org>: > 2011/7/4 Radu-Cristian FOTESCU <beranger...@yahoo.ca>: >> > [...] >> >> Oh, I see that kdebase4-runtime-4.6.90-4.mga2 was also updated, but I >> believe this update doesn't change anything (adding ntrack as a Requires is >> IMHO useless as it was installed anyway, and removing it was and it's still >> impossible, should you want to use KDE), and it also should not affect KDE. > > It's not useless at all in fact. kdebase4-runtime was ony pulling by > internal requires lib(64)ntrack0 & lib(64)ntrack-qt4 > using only the « built-in noop monitor (always online).», i did not > notice only yesterday night that his package was installed locally > (ntrack binary which provides > /usr/lib(64)/ntrack/modules/ntrack-libnl1.so. > Also it's strange that kded4 was fixed for you only today since i > pushed the new ntrack 3 days ago
Hmm, I saw the new ntrack update coming in 3 days ago but it did not fix the cpu load issue here! > when i noticed it the kde's bug you're referring in the last mail. I just created a new normal user with same standard values as my main user - KDE desktop works ok. htop shows no unusual cpu load. So, I have to find out what makes the difference. -- wobo