Am 08.07.2011 10:42, schrieb Wolfgang Bornath:
2011/7/8 James Kerr<j...@jkerr82508.free-online.co.uk>:
This thread has strayed far from the original question, which could be
re-stated as:
Should tainted free software and tainted nonfree software be commingled in a
single tainted repository?
How can tainted software be free software at the same time?
Because free is a matter of license, while tainted is a matter of patents.
For example, the libdvdcss2 is free, as the the source-code is open
(GPL) but it touches the patent issue, so it's tainted.
Regards,
Thorsten
