2011/7/13 Michael scherer <m...@zarb.org>: > > I would be in favor of treating python2 and python 3 as 2 differents > languages. > The rational is that : > - we cannot garantee to have support for both > - we will likely have some module who would be updated only on > python 3 sooner or later > - we will need to do upgrade of package at different time, since both python2 > and python3 are > released at different time. > > So rather than a complex scheme that will confuse packagers, just consider > they > are separate, and use the almost same policy ( with s/python/python3/ ) And how do you manage package that support both P2 and P3 ? (same source)
> Regarding a review of all package, that sound like daunting task :/ yes, but do you see another solution ? we can have a priority list
