On 21 July 2011 08:51, Jani Välimaa <jani.vali...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/7/21 Ahmad Samir <ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com> >> >> On 21 July 2011 05:50, Thomas Spuhler <tho...@btspuhler.com> wrote: >> > On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 08:21:40 pm Thomas Spuhler wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 01:55:28 am Anne nicolas wrote: >> >> > Hi there >> >> > >> >> > Usual mail on missing packages. Please have a look on that list to >> >> > decrease it: http://check.mageia.org/dependencies.html >> >> > >> >> > This is important to clean this list. Please report on this thread >> >> > anything you do for it. >> >> > >> >> > Cheers >> >> >> >> I have several (The horde related) and it will take some time to get >> >> this >> >> all done. there are about 30 packages I need to redo and the names all >> >> cahnge to a php-pear-Horde_Cxxxx style >> >> then there is the perlapi-5.12.2 which comes from swish-e that doesn't >> >> build on a 32 bit system. I am working with upstream to get it fixed, >> >> but >> >> they take their time. >> >> But there is one package I have a problem I cannot explain and I would >> >> like >> >> some help: >> >> php-pear-channel-symfony >> >> I have build this package twice with, well at least the system says so >> >> ( >> >> and I can install it locally), but it never makes it over to the >> >> mirrors. >> >> I checked the spelling, compared it with other channel packages, >> >> compared >> >> it to SUSE and all looks good. >> >> If someone find a little spare time... it would be appreciated >> > >> > I found this: >> > php-pear-channel-symfony found in incorrect media core.x86_64 (allowed >> > core.i586) error >> > >> > Why did it go to core.x86_64 it's a noarch package >> > How do I move (or remove) this? >> > >> > -- >> > Thomas >> > >> >> noarch packages are copied to both i586 and x86_64 repos, so the error >> on http://check.mageia.org/dependencies.html doesn't make sense to me. >> >> Another issue it php-pear-channel-symfony provides and obsoletes >> _itself_, this is wrong, IIUC. (I've submitted a new package fixing >> this issue). >> > > IIRC, It's a known problem that if you obsolete noarch package it's only > removed from i586 repos. >
That probably explains the issue; the new package is no available on both archs. > -- > Jani Välimaa > -- Ahmad Samir