Michael Scherer a écrit :
Le samedi 27 août 2011 à 22:06 +0200, Florian Hubold a écrit :
Am 04.03.2011 22:30, schrieb Michael Scherer:
But we can filter and configure it to be a little more perfect.
In a rather autocratic fashion, as the maintainer of rpmlint ( both packages
and uptream ), as a packager representative, and as a apprentice dictator
( since there is lots of open position in this sector since a few weeks ),
I propose that this become the canonical source for rpmlint configuration.
In practice, that mean that false positives will have to be added there,
that stuff that are noted as errors need to be set in that package, and
any policy changes must be made there.
Good idea
[...]
I think the following are bogus, but i may be totally wrong:
*strange-permission * for SOURCES and SPEC it complains if not 0644, why
is that?
The question is rather, "why should another permission be used ?". If
not, we can end with 700 or anything weird.
Like the 600 permissions that actually _did_ occur with Python-docs not too
long ago. We need that warning.
--
André
