On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:18:47 -0400, andre999 <andre999....@laposte.net> wrote:
it seems most appropriate to (1) have a minimal QA for the change, and (2) push the package with a low (lowest) priority
Agreed. As long as qa knows it's a cosmetic change, we'll primarily be checking that the update installs cleanly (not blocked by bug 2317), and minimal functionality tests.
