2011/11/24 Kamil Rytarowski <n...@gmx.com>
> On 24.11.2011 00:36, andre999 wrote: > >> Kamil Rytarowski a écrit : >> >>> Hello! >>> >>> As a maintainer of pastebin ( >>> http://raphael.slinckx.net/**files/<http://raphael.slinckx.net/files/>)my >>> proposition is to drop it, because: >>> - it's redundand for better&newer&more featured wgetpaste >>> - it doesn't seem to be updated upstream for years >>> >>> I can maintain it, but I would like to know that someone it really >>> needs. I don't see any rational reason to ship it - wgetpaste fully >>> supercedes it. >>> >>> In its place (or next to it) I've imported susepaste. It's well >>> supported upstream and also supports screenshot (of a single window or >>> full-screen) paste feature. >>> >>> In general that sounds good. >> >> Being only a user of pastebins, I have some concerns about flexibility of >> the width. Normally when using a pastebin, one wants to make reference to >> another window. Having a pastebin with flexible width is a big plus. >> (Like the old wiki.) >> >> The reference you give redirects to dpaste.com, which wastes width on >> the large left margin, as well as the fixed width of the body. >> (dpaste.com is better than pastebin.com, which has a much larger fixed >> width.) >> >> A much better pastebin is Lodgit (paste.pocoo.org), which has small >> left/right margins, and fully flexible width. >> Another plus is a large number of file types. (Conveniently ranged in >> alphabetical order.) >> They list the software used for their site at >> http://paste.pocoo.org/about/ (near the bottom of the page). >> >> Thank you for your feedback! > wgetpaste supports multiple pastebins, the result of the "-S" command is: > $ wgetpaste -S > Services supported: (case sensitive): > Name: | Url: > =========|================= > ca | http://pastebin.ca/ > codepad | http://codepad.org/ > dpaste | http://dpaste.com/ > osl | http://pastebin.osuosl.org/ > *pocoo | http://paste.pocoo.org/ > > And pastebin supports http://en.pastebin.ca/ > > I don't know how that compares to wgetpaste or susepaste, but thought you >> might like to consider it. >> >> I'm not sure Fedora Paste or openSUSE Paste are better than the previous > ones, but I would ship them (and I will maintain them), because of the > constant support from the upstream. > > + the handy screenshot feature from openSUSE! > >> Regards :) >> >> > Now we need pastebin.mageia.org :)