Le mardi 6 décembre 2011 00:29:03, Anssi Hannula a écrit : > > Using a separate branch is also a cleaner way of providing > > backports, and makes it easy to separate changes needed only > > for Cauldron (or backports). > > Hm, how does this help with enabling backports (i.e. compared to simply > using cauldron repo)?
The current system needs a rework to be able to accept packages submitted from cauldron to 1/backports_testing while forbidding submit from cauldron to 1/updates_testing Back in september I had proposed 2 solutions : - the current proposal from tmb, which I support (but which requires a change in the policy as it is currently defined) - allowing to submit anywhere from cauldron (and have QA verify that the packages have been submitted from the right branch, and burn publicly packagers who submit from cauldron to updates_testing) Both would require little tweaking to the build system.