On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:18 AM, Luc Menut <lme...@free.fr> wrote: > Le 08/01/2012 02:01, r...@mageia.org a écrit : >> >> Revision >> 193033 >> Author >> dmorgan >> Date >> 2012-01-08 02:01:07 +0100 (Sun, 08 Jan 2012) >> >> >> Log Message >> >> Suggests sectools instead of a Requires ( mga # 2808) >> >> >> Modified Paths >> >> * updates/1/msec/current/SPECS/msec.spec >> <#updates1mseccurrentSPECSmsecspec> >> >> >> Modified: updates/1/msec/current/SPECS/msec.spec >> =================================================================== >> --- updates/1/msec/current/SPECS/msec.spec 2012-01-08 00:58:08 UTC >> (rev 193032) >> +++ updates/1/msec/current/SPECS/msec.spec 2012-01-08 01:01:07 UTC >> (rev 193033) >> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ >> -%define subrel 5 >> +%define subrel 6 >> >> Name: msec >> Version: 0.80.10 >> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ >> Requires: chkconfig >> Requires: mailx >> Requires: python >> -Requires: sectool >> +Suggests: sectool >> # at least xargs is used >> Requires: findutils >> # ensure sysctl.conf and inittab are present before installing msec >> >> > > wouldn't it be better to split the sectool plugin in a subpackage, cf. > https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2255#c68 > https://bugs.mageia.org/attachment.cgi?id=1329&action=diff > > Luc > > -- > Luc Menut
this can be an idea yes, i will take this into consideration
