On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 16:13, D.Morgan <dmorga...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:05 AM, David Walser <luigiwal...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> There is a fork of procps called procps-ng, which I think lives here: >> http://www.ohloh.net/p/procps-ng >> >> Debian has switched to using it, as can be seen here: >> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/procps/procps_3.3.2-3/changelog >> >> Should we switch to it as well, or stick with procps? > > i have not yet looked, but what fedora did ?
https://gitorious.org/procps says "Debian, Fedora and openSUSE fork of procps."
