On 18.02.2012 19:56, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Le 18/02/2012 01:28, andre999 a écrit :Once again 'virtual provide' makes no sense, just because there is no non-virtual provides (and in plain english, no provides at all, because that's a verb, not a noun). They are virtual *packages*, by opposition to actual packages, for which you can find a file with same name.Exactly. Let's document all virtual provides.
Thank you for this e-mail.
