On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 21:22, Maarten Vanraes <al...@rmail.be> wrote: > I noticed that on my system, some libraries are marked executable and others > aren't. > > I know that certain libraries are executable, like libc, but i figure that > this > is rather the exception rather than the rule.
Yes but I think all c/c++ libs are generated with execution permission > I wonder if we should have some kind of policy about this? I don't think so > I can be wrong, but i didn't think it's necessary to make libraries as > executable? For most of them it is not useful > I don't want any bikeshedding, but what do you think? is such a policy useful? > or not? I would say it doesn't matter and would not spend any time on it