Le jeudi 15 mars 2012 20:35:08, Maarten Vanraes a écrit : > Op donderdag 15 maart 2012 18:35:04 schreef Juan Luis Baptiste: > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Bertaux Xavier <berta...@yahoo.fr> wrote: > > >> If this is the case, then I say that xonotic should be allowed to be > > >> updated. > > > > > > I'm not about to be okay with that, a version Freeze only accepts > > > updates on bug fixes and security warnings, so RC to Release is OK but > > > not to revision's change, otherwise that would mean that if fate > > > xonotic in version 0.7 just before the Release we should built. > > > To me this should be pushed Backport, to limit the update after Release > > > > Backports are for new versions, not bug fixes. In this case even as > > this is a new version, the use of an older version of the game client > > with a new game server version could bring issues to users, so that > > makes this release more of a "bug fix release", because we are trying > > to avoid any possible problem to our users, not because we want to > > have the latest version of the game. If we leave the current version > > and then a user reports a problem while playing the game, the 0.6 or > > 0.7 or whatever version is available at the time would be pushed as an > > update, not as a backport. > > well, the version policy is for updates. > > my point here is that we should maybe equalize & simplify our policys by > having the same kind of "exceptions" in both policies. >
It's already the case. If you re-read Ennael's mail about version freeze, it says exactly that about exceptions. Samuel