Le 16/03/2012 03:01, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
So I'd rather revert the change, and make lighttpd autonomous also.
Unless someone can convince me there is an advantage having lighttpd
executing as 'apache' :)
The web applications policy has files being owned by 'apache' user, and
I don't see how that could work if lighttpd used a different user:
https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Web_applications_policy
This policy was crafted with apache in mind only, not all available web
servers. And its explicitely refers to apache integration, not generic
webserver compatibility. For instance, the configuration file provided
is apache-specific. Even if we have compatible file permissions, and if
we asked packagers to also provide a default lighttpd configuration file
(slighly more work), that would still be mostly theorical compatibility
without actual testing from the packagers (many more work).
So, rather than a potential compatibility, without documented limits,
should we rather not make clear than adapting our web applications
package to any other web server than apache is fully up to the end user ?
--
BOFH excuse #202:
kernel panic: write-only-memory (/dev/wom0) capacity exceeded.