05.05.2012 16:35, Dimitri kirjoitti: > Please push libjpeg. The updated version fixes Provides: libjpeg62 for > both 32- and 64-bit platforms. It's important because now it's > impossible to require libjpeg62 on a 64-bit platform, one has to require > lib64jpeg62 instead.
Isn't that provide altogether wrong? - 32-bit package name is libjpeg62, so no provide needed - 64-bit package name is lib64jpeg62, and we *don't want* to provide libjpeg62, since that would mean packages wanting the 32-bit package could get the 64-bit package instead. -- Anssi Hannula