-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Il 28/06/2012 04:00, Johnny A. Solbu ha scritto: > No, it is Not obvious. It is called Backports for a reason. It is > software that is not part of the release, and is to be treated as > experimental/beta software, as it could wery well break your system > if you don't know what you are doing. This is *not* obvious as well. It's not written anywhere that should be experimental, with beta/alpha programs.... A backport is just something that is not part of the release, yes, but also that should not be get through update. There's no reasons to talk about backports in fedora probably, since all goes to update for the most, our policy says (or will do) what can (and what can't) go to backports.
Said that, backports have been approved last night meeting, let's talk about bp subject again in case of problems (that of course we won't have since we're very good at :D ) Cheers, Angelo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/sFMYACgkQqEs9DA4DquBjQQCdEc0gSDF5eRvSVQ8iV1U8RnA/ BFAAn1IaPt75SVVCcNarlHYEK0t9EU63 =0vqO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----