On 23 July 2012 22:23, Olivier Blin <mag...@blino.org> wrote: >> I'm tempted to blame mesa to some degree, but no real evidence :) > > There was indeed a refcount fix > (c3bc41011f9ffe648b7dd4915c6202b776cd1ab4) in mesa that I did not have in > my snapshot. > I am updating it.
Then you should have explained in mesa changelog why you updated the snapshot...
