24.07.2012 19:33, Colin Guthrie kirjoitti: > 'Twas brillig, and Olivier Blin at 24/07/12 17:30 did gyre and gimble: >> Thierry Vignaud <thierry.vign...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> On 24 July 2012 11:28, Colin Guthrie <mag...@colin.guthr.ie> wrote: >>>>> Some links were broken in / (they work only if cwd is /): >>>>> >>>>> -lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Gou 24 08:30 bin -> usr/bin >>>>> +lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Gou 24 08:42 bin -> /usr/bin >>>>> >>>>> -lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Gou 24 08:30 lib -> usr/lib >>>>> -lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Gou 24 08:30 lib64 -> usr/lib64 >>>>> +lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Gou 24 08:42 lib -> /usr/lib >>>>> +lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Gou 24 08:42 lib64 -> /usr/lib64 >>>>> >>>>> -lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Gou 24 08:30 sbin -> usr/sbin >>>>> +lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Gou 24 08:42 sbin -> /usr/sbin >>>>> >>>>> Note the missing leading "/"... >>>> >>>> Yup this is intentional. There is no need to a leading /. IMO this is >>>> just a bash bug: >>>> >>>> e.g. >>>> >>>> mkdir -p foo/usr/bin >>>> ln -snf usr/bin foo/bin >>>> ls -l foo/ >>>> >>>> The above is no different and works fine. >>> >>> yes that's a ls bug that display them as broken >> >> Maybe this one? >> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/commit/?id=6124a3842dfa8484b52e067a8ab8105c3875a4f7 > > Certainly sounds like it!
Applied. -- Anssi Hannula