'Twas brillig, and Pascal Terjan at 04/09/12 17:57 did gyre and gimble: > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Romain d'Alverny <rdalve...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Thierry Vignaud >> <thierry.vign...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 4 September 2012 16:11, <r...@mageia.org> wrote: >>>> Revision 5642 Author rda Date 2012-09-04 16:11:36 +0200 (Tue, 04 Sep 2012) >>>> >>>> Log Message >>>> >>>> skip packages with no name >>> >>> Is that possible? >> >> Well, I am guilty of not having checked further why, but it happens >> that at the end of the list of packages being built, we used to have >> all the info, except the package name. So it may be that it was >> mis-parsed, but why on these specific occurrences? is it related to >> the fact that it's "old packages" (submitted about 48 hours before) >> and that some parts of the related files were already removed? > > It is related, files are not removed but to get information we do a > find of files with a limit on mtime, so we are missing some > information if they were submitted over 2 days ago but built less than > 2 days ago > >> By the way, there are some builds that get a strangely reported build >> duration (15588 days; always the same value when it occurs). I didn't >> investigate yet.
So 15588 would be days since epoch. I guess it's the same as Pascal's comment. If it was submitted over 2 days ago we might not read the submit time and it ends up getting a timestamp of 0 and thus 15588 days to build. Col -- Colin Guthrie colin(at)mageia.org http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/ Open Source: Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/ PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/ Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/