On 11/10/12 18:59, AL13N wrote:
Op donderdag 11 oktober 2012 19:19:33 schreef Sander Lepik:
11.10.2012 18:32, Barry Jackson kirjutas:
On 11/10/12 12:29, Sander Lepik wrote:
11.10.2012 13:58, Barry Jackson kirjutas:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19909106
Maybe we should revert in Cauldron?
Well, it's cauldron and the bug will be fixed before we get it reverted.
We just have to wait a day or two. 16.0.1 candidate is already uploaded,
so the bug is probably already fixed..
True - however since I use Cauldron 24/7 I have reverted to 15.0.1 and
added it to skip.list for my own peace of mind ;)
Barry
So, instead of 1 security hole you now have 14 (most of them critical
:http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox.html#firefox1
:6)? ;P
Not sure if it's safer or not :)
--
Sander
the thing is: 1 very new one, or 14 old ones... that's the trick...
1 for which only very very recently an exploit and 14 widespread exploits
Point taken - it was fixed very quickly.
