On 20 November 2012 09:18, Anssi Hannula <an...@mageia.org> wrote: >> I changed the value to 10000 as well and it worked. So it is definitely >> too low of a limit (1000) - > > As another random datapoint, I just tested (--test) upgrading one of my > mga2 boxes to cauldron, and the count was 8213 there. The loop took > approx. 3 seconds to execute, so we could probably make the value e.g. > 50000 or 100000?
or better detect that are doing exactly the same thing as in the previous iteration with no change. I've two environment cases for that - a mirror having synced while primary mirror was being updated, thus having bits of two different gtk+ version - a bogus perl modules upgrade