On 26 November 2012 16:15, Colin Guthrie <[email protected]> wrote: > Just a followup to this and some other gst related discussions of late, > should we perhaps think about simplifying the gstreamer packaging a bit. > > We're quite subpackage-y at the moment. I accept this allows to keep an > install minimal and avoids pulling in dependant libs etc, but I think in > 95-99% (guess) of cases, this isn't needed. > > e.g. it's pretty much impossible these days to install things without > libpulse, so why bother separating out the gst-pulse plugin from -good > generally? Likewise for several other containers and codecs. > > Maybe just something to do with the gst1.0 packages - a fresh start?
should be done for both IMHO
