-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 25/03/2013 16:06, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > Le 25/03/2013 11:13, Matteo Pasotti a ￩crit : >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hello, can someone push nomacs, please? Version 1.0.0 ships with >> a lot of improvements and bugfixes (we currently provide the >> version 0.4.0). > The point of a version freeze is not "let's bring as much > improvements and bugfixes as possible", but "let's make sure that > was is supposed to be working now still works tomorrow". > > So the magic keywords would rather be "nothing depends on nomacs, > I'm the maintainer, and I commit myself to fix every potential > issues arising thereafter".
Yeap, I wrote about the improvements to highlight that this release provides not only bugfixes but also new stuff that can potentially break. At least this was what I had in my mind :-P Then I wrote that we are currently providing version 0.4.0 to point out that -as I'm the maintainer- it could be difficult to backport each bugfix from 0.5.0 to 1.0.0 into the current version. It's quite clear to me the reason of a version freeze but maybe I should pay more attention to the way I write freeze push requests. Thank you Guillaume. - -- Matteo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRUHKFAAoJED3LowjDDWbN2ysIAJp4qaQS1yBSX+ftP9X+5w/+ NQp0MNw2JZJcXG6wj96bFPAszgRz3T7UN6cDAf+CDaPp2Akn2cfe0au6EspdenP0 xwXutXiLBrKh6JMtXZlE9mXny06LctKYaCoarZkkdDtHeMat4ADZYcKF1gV/39D1 yt4XIWouSplDb80wMrRuC90toq/f2BpVesEccWky82nho/2KPm7f3A8D4iV9Uksc VcDdikqkk8sH1cGUjy2EaBLuSHTrF/52UzemZ5e2lsjyEPFCsomNDpre1pPNk1s8 aSYY5xiruZDkqYfaEVeNgFZUVLdmFxmYsM88cqEG7LNnI0CjlMISLe7UXg4YFYU= =kj8k -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
