On Saturday, April 06, 2013 03:50:36 AM Barry Jackson wrote: > On 31/01/13 17:26, David Walser wrote: > > Sander Lepik <sander.lepik@...> writes: > >> New icu was pushed. Maybe packages depending on it need to be rebuilded. > >> > >>From what upstream said, it sounds like some users of the icu library > >>don't use > >> > > the affected part, and so maybe they don't all need rebuilt, but if they > > do, here's the list urpmq gave me of SRPMS that use libicu: > > > > 389-admin > > 389-adminutil > > 389-ds-base > > beecrypt > > boost > > calibre > > calligra > > chromium-browser-unstable > > couchdb > > dee > > fcitx > > firebird > > harfbuzz > > ibus-qt4 > > ircclient-qt > > libreoffice > > mapnik > > openttd > > parrot > > php > > qt4 > > qtbase5 > > raptor2 > > R-base > > sword > > texlive > > tracker > > webkit > > webkit-efl > > xerces-c > > yaz > > zarafa > > Several of these also need boost, so perhaps this is a good time to make > a decision on boost-1.53? > Everything now builds except libyui for which there is a possible patch > that I have not had time to test. > I have test rebuilt 0ad again that was just updated and am currently > rebuilding libreoffice again on both arch.
Maybe we should move to boost-1.53 now if those package who use it build. -- Best regards Thomas Spuhler
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.