Le 2010-09-24 02:54, herman a écrit :
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 23:45 -0700, Maarten Vanraes wrote:

Instead of commercialising Mageia, i would propose that a page be provided by
people who are willing to provide support on Mageia to companies. (more or
less like debian)

I am not saying a separately branded enterprise version is off the table, i'm
merely stating that at the start of this project, it may instill some
confidence in our project if companies could see that some kind of support will
be available.
Yes, I would also prefer this model.  There is a legal issue with it
though.  In order for a consultant to provide support to a third party,
the distribution artwork and other utilities must be free for use and
distribution to third parties.  So the use of the GPL3 is not allowed
and trademarked artwork must be explicitly given away.

In short, Mageia would need a license similar to the Scientific Linux
distribution: https://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/faq/legal

I am not too sure what problems GPL3 bring to the artwork. Would the artwork license of GPL3 make it viral to other softs on the installed machines?

Marc

_______________________________________________
Mageia-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss

Reply via email to