Anssi Hannula <[email protected]> writes: > On Friday 01 October 2010 13:46:36 Olivier Blin wrote: >> BTW, we could also consider migrating to a PLF-like tree structure, >> which looks better structured: >> >> media/ >> main/ >> release/ >> binary/ >> noarch/ >> arch1/ >> arch2/ >> ... >> debug/ >> arch1/ >> arch2/ >> ... >> source/ >> testing/ >> ... >> updates/ >> ... >> backports/ >> contrib/ >> ... >> non-free/ >> ... > > The problem with that layout is that it doesn't really work well with > media.cfg, so we'd need changes in the format as well if this layout is > chosen. > > (think where to place media.cfg and what it would contain)
media.cfg would still be in media/media_info PLF is already using a similar layout with no issue, what would be the problem exactly? -- Olivier Blin - blino
