On 10/12/2010 10:54 AM, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
There needs to be some sort of formal designation (to know who is working with whom and on what) as well as progress/final reporting and archives of discussions or results. But that's something to iron out of practice.
Sure - I did not want to drown the suggestion in too much administration-mindedenes. The minimum to require would probably be
- to draft a very short summary on what the WP wants to achieve (some kind of terms of reference - if you have formulated what you want to do, you have prepared a solid base for the work),
- to have a clearly defined figurehead (party-leader) who has the role of maintaining communication with the Council,
- and maybe to fix a deadline for a first feedback to the Council on what is happening (to avoid having open-ended activities hanging around).
As you say: iron out of practice - try one or 2 projects, learn from the experience and use that as the base for defining the rules of the game.
