Le mercredi 20 octobre 2010 15:06:34, Wolfgang Bornath a écrit : > > 2010/10/20 Frederic Janssens <[email protected]>: > > > > So I think that should be reflected in this document by avoiding to suggest > > that one must be in the one or the other category. We should emphasise that > > there is a continuum of involvement, not a jump into another status. > > IMHO it is reflecting the 2 groups very well. The second part does not > say that users are not involved, quite the contrary. It says that > users can add value to the project through their support. This is > exactyl what I've been doing for mandriva and will do for Mageia. I do > not see me as a contributor who improves the distribution because I've > never added one line of code to any part of the distribution and most > likely I will not do it for Mageia because I do not have the necessary > knowledge/skills. I am a user who adds value to the project by > supporting other users with answers, documentation, translation, > communication, etc. > > Reading the 2 descriptions carefully reveals that both groups are > defined very well. It's nowhere written that somebody can not be a > member of both groups (if I could code or package I'd see me in both > groups). > > But this is only my 2K Euros worth. As this text is open for review, > you're very welcome to propose a better text which describes your > understanding of this "our community is made up....". >
The word "divided" probably could be changed to something better. Regards Samuel
