2011/6/7 Olav Vitters <[email protected]>

> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:48:55AM +0200, Thomas Lottmann wrote:
> > On the other hand, I'd like to still have the possibility to keep
> > and install Gnome 2.xx in the future, as Gnome 3 isn't both stable
> > and reliable and complete yet.
>
> GNOME 2.x is not needed, there is the fallback mode in GNOME3; it'll
> give you a gnome-panel and so on. The default layout looks like
> GNOME-shell, but it just is a newer gnome-panel.
>
Fallback mode would be killed someday....

I don't think that a good statement to argue that GNOME3 can replace

GNOME2.

Reply via email to