On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 21:58:05 +1000, Doug Laidlaw wrote:

> I was told that it was because I had 
> a 32-bit version installed on a 64-bit capable machine.  Sure enough, when I 
> installed the 64-bit version, I got the desktop kernel by default.

  OIC. Interesting!
I've been steering clear of 64-bit installs, until there a less
problems with 64-bit apps.

Pro tem I have converted to desktop kernels via urpmi.

I still think the installter should have a 'server v. desktop' choice.

-- 
/\/\aurice 


Reply via email to