2012/1/28 Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]>: > On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:19:45 +0100 > Wolfgang Bornath <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> > (and let's not talk about "Modern GUI": for me Gnome 2 is as modern as >> > Gnome 3 and KDE 4) >> >> "modern" in this context means "opposed to the traditional GUIs". > > "traditional" is undefined. Is Gnome 2 traditional? What about Gnustep? > And Cinnamon? > > For example, I'd like to see Cinnamon in the next Mageia, not because > it's traditional or modern, but because it's for me the only reasonable > compensation for losing Gnome 2. > >> > So, I've answered the poll, but my real answer is the following: if I >> > had to use a distribution with only 3 qualities out of all these, I >> > would be an unhappy user. >> >> Looks like you did not read the initial posting where I explain what I >> mean with "top requirements". Of course I could have allowed for 5 or >> 10 votes, but my intention is to find out the most important features >> a distribution must have, otherwise you would not touch it. > > Well, what I'm saying is that "top requirements" is not how I function, > and I don't think it's how most users function either.
No problem if it is not how you function. Your opinion about other users is your opinion. > This poll sounds like you might end up concluding "ok, our users value > features over stability, so we're gonna make a crashy distro with many > features". Surely you understand how unreasonable that is: even these > users which said they values features will still get angry about the > crashes. If you want to draw such unreasonable conclusions, fine. Don't expect me to do the same. -- wobo
