Doug, As the suggestion of several people, I'm subscribing in the list Marcom - Mageia-marketing (Mageia marketing team discussion list)
https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-marketing There are two pages with news about mageia: https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Archive:Initial_press_release_on_the_Mageia_fork https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Mageia1_Press In category of the "press": https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Category:Press I think it is necessary to create a page about Mageia2_Press, or Mageia_2_Press. Thanks for your suggestions Cheers Macxi Em qui 17 mai 2012, às 23:17:06, Doug Laidlaw escreveu: > On Thu, 17 May 2012 19:59:00 -0300 > > Macxi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The page of Mageia in wkipedia (in english) has been deleted in May > > 13, 2012. > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mageia > > > > The report of the decision here: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mageia > > > > I mentioned this in the Fórum Mageia, topic "Re: mageia information > > (wikipedia):" > > https://forums.mageia.org/en/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=2428#p18065 > > > > I'm worried because many people will look for information about > > mageia next week, when the Mageia 2 is released, and I really like > > the wikipedia and I think an important source of information for > > everyone who wants to learn more about Mageia, > > > > I suggest create a page "Mageia 2 Press" in Mageia Wiki: ( > > https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Category:Mageia_2 ) and request the > > reactivation of the page. > > > > Macxi > > I suggest that before doing that, you look at the reasons for its > deletion, and that a new page answering the criticisms be prepared. I > have edited an article (a minor edit) but I can't do one from scratch, > it needs somebody better informed than a distant user, and whose mind > isn't turning to jelly (I will be 70 next year; does that make me a > candidate for the oldest user?) The page itself needs a certain > structure, with a summary to introduce the main article, although > sometimes, that isn't obvious. I looked up Hoover of England once. > The editors didn't like that page because it was too much like > advertising. > > Wikipedia always say that they don't want first-hand information or an > author's personal preferences. They want sources themselves to be > encyclopedia-like. If you have a break-through idea, you can't put it > up until it is in research journals. That can be difficult for > something brand new. > > Doug.
