On 06/13/2012 05:23 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:

On 13/06/12 09:42, andre999 wrote:
TJ a écrit :

Oops. Should have looked before asking that last question. I see
Lightspark is a dependency for Gnash.

But do they make a functional alternative to Adobe's offering...

TJ

I tried Gnash a couple of years ago and wasn't impressed.  But now
I block flash by default (and rarely unblock) so I couldn't say.
When I tried it before, it could be installed the same time as
Flash. The latest version is in core.  So why not try it and see ?

As I understand it, Adobe is planning to phase out support for all
flash in favour of something based on HTML5, but I could be
mistaken.

The current version is, according to Adobe, the last one that will be
released for Linux.

Anne
Yes, something about a deal with Google that future Linux versions of the plugin will be a part of Chrome and not released separately. Mozilla refused to go along. I don't know the details, including whether the new Flash-players will work with Chromium as well.

I'm a farmer, and I sometimes miss the local TV weather broadcast, but I can watch a Flash video of it on the station's website if I do. Also, from time to time I like to watch videos from the local newspaper, and of course, Youtube. Not to mention the occasional instructional video.

I tried both Gnash and Lightspark from the repositories, finding that only one Flash-playing plugin is allowed in Firefox. Only Adobe's offering played everywhere. Gnash seemed to work OK with Youtube, but not with some other sites, like that TV site mentioned above. Lightspark wasn't much, if any, better. Looking at the web pages for each, I see that each has had a release newer than the one in the repositories, but from what I see they haven't developed enough to do what I need.

Could be that eventually, if I want to watch a video I'll just have to use Chrome - no doubt what Google had in mind all along.

TJ

Reply via email to