> working with 5 because the current version of 6 is twice as slow for our
Have you tried recent versions of ImageMagick? It has multiple performance improvements including support for parallel processing on dual and quad core processors. Its extreme but we did get one report of a process that went from 34 seconds to 4 on an 4 dual-core processor host. Regarding version 5 syntax, Anthony may have a solution for you in a subsequent e-mail. _______________________________________________ Magick-users mailing list [email protected] http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users
