On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:45:41 EDT [email protected] wrote: | Thank you for the clarification. What I ended up doing, which may or may | not be most efficient, was perform an interim save of the file as a jpg | with quality 100, then load and perform the subsequent size reduction using | that version. All the colors available to the jpg fomat were then available | for use during the performance of the reduction. The result was | significantly improved. | WARNING: any use of JPEG, unless it is the JPEG2000 library, will result in color distortions, even at quality 100.
Anthony Thyssen ( System Programmer ) <[email protected]> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Losing one glove is certainly painful, but nothing compared to the pain, of losing one, throwing away the other, and finding the first one again. -- Piet Hein ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anthony's Home is his Castle http://www.cit.gu.edu.au/~anthony/ _______________________________________________ Magick-users mailing list [email protected] http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users
