On Thursday 14 April 2011 17:19:44 Fred Weinhaus wrote: > I believe most people would agree that ImageMagick is much more > feature rich and flexible. My understanding is that GraphicsMagick > was a spin-off of Imagemagick from many years ago and has not changed > much since then. Take a look a Anthony's Example pages to see all the > new enhancement features such as various distort functions and > morphology. http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/ > > Fred >
> http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users Interesting. The bleeding edge development version of Scribus, 1.5.0, can be compiled with GraphicsMagick in order to handle some newer versions of vector graphics (exactly what versions I am still asking about.) Per the GraphicsMagick web page the fork occurred in 2002 and the last stable branch was released in March 8, 2010, indicating that there is not much active work going on. -- John Culleton Create Book Covers with Scribus: http://www.booklocker.com/books/4055.html _______________________________________________ Magick-users mailing list [email protected] http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users
