Brock, I would suggest you repost this to the Discourse Server Users forum (http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/), where the PNG developer might have a better chance of seeing this and responding. Also other IM users may have more knowledge about this situation. PNG has been undergoing quite some changes (bug fixes and enhancements over the last many releases. You could also post links to your two images so others can test. Perhaps your version of IM needs upgrading. I don't recall if you mentioned what version you are using.
Fred >The first creates a 64 bit palette (not 8 bit) but the image itself looked >correct. > >convert secoora.west.qkm_sst.png secoora.east.qkm_sst.png +append -type >palette test.png >optics 220 :/optics1/virtual_ant/etc/cl> identify test.png >test.png PNG 7480x7480 7480x7480+0+0 PseudoClass 65536c 3.8e+02kb 0.980u 0:02 > >The second, oddly, created a proper sized image, but scrunched the contents of >both into 1/4 of the image on the x axis. So the top to bottom perspective >was maintained, but the left to right was skewed with the whole appended >image in the left 1/4 and right 3/4 of the image all in black. As you can see >it is a 3 bit palette. > >convert secoora.west.qkm_sst.png secoora.east.qkm_sst.png +append >PNG8:test2.png >optics 224 :/optics1/virtual_ant/etc/cl> identify test2.png >test2.png PNG 7480x7480 7480x7480+0+0 PseudoClass 3c 1.5e+02kb > >Thanks > >Brock > _______________________________________________ Magick-users mailing list [email protected] http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick-users
