ME>> So perhaps it is wise to ask whether M should offer basic GPG support ME>> in the near term, with a more full-bodied design in the long term. VZ> VZ> I surely don't have anything against such basic GPG support but I don't VZ> have time to work on it. I can (well, I hope I will) help it by VZ> implementing the wxExecute wrapper as I promised but that's about all. VZ> OTOH, I am prepared to sacrifice more time for a more long-term encryption VZ> framework.
If you put the wxExecute stuff in there, I would be much more inclined to add the basic GPG support. Thanks for the encouragement! VZ> The main problem with the The Bat's approach is that it uses the old PGP VZ> email standard (the "BEGIN PGP ..." markers in the text) and not the new VZ> MIME-based one and I believe that only the latter is important for the VZ> future. For example, I see no need to produce the messages in old format VZ> even if it might be nice to be able to read them. VZ> Well, I think the *user* should be allowed to format messages as he wants, not as Mahogany developers want. The current PGP format is tried and true. Not many email clients support S/MIME yet, to my knowledge. Even if they all did, there are web-based PGP services (MailVault.com) which employ the old format and thousands of PGP users who still employ it. It is not going away and Mahogany should support it. The idea here is to offer users the choice. Thanks VZ- M. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek PC Mods, Computing goodies, cases & more http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
