On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 22:34:10 +0100 Xavier Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
XN> Another thing is that the status of a PGP signature is not easily XN> described using only an enum: a signature is: XN> - good or bad XN> - expired or not XN> - has one of 4 levels of trust My idea was to use MCryptoEngineOutputLog for any additional info because it is more flexible than using a return code. XN> Additionally, some useful information could be added. A interesting XN> thing I would like to see is: XN> XN> Good PGP signature from "Xavier Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" Nothing prevents us from adding Set/GetSigner() methods to MCryptoEngineOutputLog... XN> So I propose that the object returned by the crypto functions has such XN> an API (which should do for both verifying signatures and decrypting): ... XN> Any comments? I don't know if it's actually better to use this than the current setup. Regards, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
