On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 12:54:02 +1000 (E. Australia Standard Time) Mark Livingstone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ML>
ML> In Claire, I have all the 'spam' filters just turned on.
ML>
ML> Today I noticed it called this message SPAM:
ML>
ML> [M-CVS] CVS: M CHANGES,1.312,1.313
ML>
ML> I'm wondering, would it be worthwhile having filters add a header to
ML> tell what reason it has for calling a message possible spam?
They do it already, extract from my log window (wrapped for convenience):
13:17:37: Filtering message 62/67 (from David Harris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> about 'New version is out') -
recognized as spam (pure HTML content); moved to IMAP/Junk
Note the words in parentheses.
But nevertheless the "all caps" filter is still too eager -- however I
don't really know how to fix it. We could consider that any message
containing "CVS" is not spam :-) But better would be to have a more general
whitelist (containing both addresses and keywords).
Regards,
VZ
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
_______________________________________________
Mahogany-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
