On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 14:16:31 +1000 (E. Australia Standard Time) Mark Livingstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ML> Anything that is of a "wishlist" / "feature request" will for the ML> moment be ignored. Stability / making current stuff work comes first ML> over adding new stuff. Does that seem reasonable? Yes and no. In general, bugs should, of course, be fixed before adding new features but as the example of a composer shows, sometimes it is easier and better to add a new feature (new composer) than fix the bugs in the old code. ML> I am completely ignoring stuff in the CVS TODO list / other text ML> files. Thats Vadim's problem LOL ;-) Yes, right. TODO is more than 4 years old, too... ML> I will have to experiment as to the rate of assigning stuff. I ML> certainly am not aiming for a Bug du jour but maybe closer to a bug du ML> (what is week?). Semaine :-) Anyhow, the rate is not important, what is important is to get the clear list of bugs (for each person which basically means Xavier and me right now) in the order of priorities. Thanks! VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
